Yury Vasiliev of Sport Express broke the news yesterday that Veselin Topalov would, after all, be willing to play Candidates Matches in Russia. Today, in the full version of the interview, Silvio Danailov goes into much greater detail on his feelings towards Kramnik, his disapproval of FIDE’s conduct during the match in Sofia, and the upcoming matches and Olympiad.
Here are some excerpts from the interview:
Is it true that Anand received 100,000 euros for agreeing to play the match in Sofia?
Yes, it’s true. Initially he wanted 300,000 more. After long negotiations he got 100,000. That money wasn’t from us, but from FIDE. We paid FIDE a very large sum from which, I assume, Anand was paid that extra fee. Normally, as you know, FIDE gets 20% of the prize fund. But from us they asked for 30, explaining that they wanted to develop “Global Chess”. In other words because they couldn’t find sponsors for the Anand-Topalov match they took 30% from us, and not 20%. And we were forced to pay.
After the match Anand gave a long interview in India in which he talked about how in the match with Topalov he was helped by the three Ks: Kasparov, Carlsen [spelt with a “K” in Russian] and Kramnik. In his time, after the defeat to Kramnik in London, Kasparov told me that “almost the whole of the former USSR team” was working against him. And he added: “clearly out of particularly warm sentiments towards me…”. Do you think that the three Ks helped Anand “out of particularly warm sentiments” to you, Silvio?
(Gloomily) I don’t think that the motives were personal. The help of the three Ks that Anand talked about can be explained by pure politics. They were afraid that if Topalov won the match our influence would be too great. And they did everything they could to prevent that. In general, I have to say that during the match everyone was rooting against us, except the Bulgarians. Including FIDE, which absolutely didn’t try to hide it. And Mr. Makropoulos, the match “supervisor”, conducted himself like Anand’s manager.
But it seemed to me that in the episode with the Icelandic volcano, when Makropoulos used his power to give Anand an extra day for adapting after the difficult journey, he acted correctly.
But how would you have looked if Anand, who in any case crashed to defeat in the first game, had then explained it by saying that he wasn’t given a chance to recover after the tiring trip…
When eight days before the match Anand got stuck in Frankfurt I immediately told him: “Take a car and in 24 hours you’ll be in Sofia”. But they sat around for three days in the airport and only then set off on their land trip. And all because Mr. Makropoulos promised them that “there won’t be a problem”.
There’s some discussion about how the defeat affected Topalov and Bulgaria, and Danailov points out how successful the match was in terms of global interest. He mentions Sofia Rules being part of this and points out that, “even people who don’t like us very much – I have in mind the organisers of the tournament in Dortmund – have also adopted them”. Then the interview moves on to current affairs:
So now we come to the main reason why I called you. How is Veselin intending to fight for the title if he “refuses to play in Kazan or in any other Russian city”, as he wrote in his open letter?
You should read his letter more carefully. It doesn’t say that Topalov refuses to play in Russia. He’ll go to Khanty-Mansiysk for the Olympiad and will represent Bulgaria on board one. Topalov is refusing to play a match with a Russian player in Russia, if that match is connected to the title struggle. The chances of Topalov meeting a Russian player in Kazan aren’t high as for that they’d both need to get to the final, though it’s a possibility.
And in general we were really outraged that the very proposal to switch the matches to Kazan appeared suddenly, at the last moment. FIDE kept the candidacy a secret. They’ve long known that there was a problem with Baku because of Aronian, and that it was impossible to resolve. An international federation with self respect should have opened up bidding for running the Candidates Matches in another city. Sofia, by the way, could have offered a million dollars. Where’s the problem?
But, like magicians, they produced the Kazan candidacy “from up their sleeve” at the last moment and now say: this is where you’ll play. While at the same time they’re retaining the nominee from Baku – Shakhriyar Mamedyarov. It’s absurd! If the matches are run in Russia then the nominee should be from Russia. What’s Azerbaijan got to do with it?
I’ll ask FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov about it when I meet him in the next few days. And what do you think of the proposal of Grandmaster Emil Sutovsky, a member of the committee for running the World Championship and Olympiad: to play the quaterfinals and the semifinals over six games instead of four. And then after almost a half-year break to have a final over eight games, and already for a different, larger amount of money.
It’s not only Sutovsky who thinks like that. Topalov also holds the same opinion and, as far as I know, so does Magnus Carlsen. But it would be enough for the break between the semi-finals and finals to be 20 or 30 days. In a match over four games the players who are weaker will aim to bring the “long” games to a draw and decide the fate of the match in a tie-break, where the element of chance is greater. In matches over six games it’s harder to do that. Carlsen, as far as I know, won’t sign a contract if they propose playing 20 days in a row in Kazan. If the first and second place players in the world ratings won’t take part in the competition then we’ll see what sort of a candidates tournament we’ll have…
Did I understand correctly: if FIDE decide to increase the number of games, then Topalov’s prepared to play a quaterfinal, and if successful, a semifinal match in Kazan?
What does it mean, “prepared, not prepared”? Those are just words. Let them show us a contract, conditions, a prize fund. When we see all of that we’ll take a decision.
But if everything you mention is satisfactory to you then Topalov can travel to Kazan?
Why not? We’ll study the proposed contract, and if everything suits us then Topalov, of course, will travel to Kazan.
But if Kramnik gets to the final, then Topalov won’t play him in Russia. Correct?
Veselin expressed it clearly in his letter.
And what about what you said to me in Bilbao about how it was necessary to forget the resentment from “Elista 2006” and turn over a new leaf?
The Russian player we played a match against in 2006 in Elista doesn’t exist for us!
But what if that player, who’s called Vladimir Kramnik, nevertheless, as they say, “materialises”? And you have to play him?
If we have to, then we’ll play. For example, perhaps in Khanty-Mansiysk we’ll manage to cross swords…
Silvio Danailov talks a little about the Olympiad and how they’re planning a “baptism of fire” for the 12-year-old Kiprian Berbatov, who he says is already playing at grandmaster level. Asked about the elections Danailov says he’s 100% sure he’ll win, and explains:
Judge for yourself: I’m the only candidate who has his own personal website. The only one who has a serious election manifesto and a serious professional team. I know how to turn the European Chess Union into as prosperous and rich an organisation as UEFA. And I say that with such confidence because in the last five years I’ve brought more than 10 million euro in sponsorship money into chess.
The thumbnail photo linked to this story was taken from Danailov’s campaign website. Update: as “Ericson” points out in the comments, Ali Nihat Yazici, the Turkish candidate for the ECU Presidency, also has his own campaign website. And as “Thomas” points out, so does the third candidate, Robert von Weizsäcker.
UPDATE: 12:10 31 July
In a recent interview with T. Tushiev for Extra Time, Zurab Azmaiparashvili repeats Danailov’s comments above about Carlsen wanting longer matches and a break between the semi-finals and final. He goes on to claim that Carlsen said he didn’t want to play an Azerbaijani grandmaster in Azerbaijan, and was demanding a contract that would include the match against Anand (and promise more than the 1 million euro currently on offer).
Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, in an interview with Yury Vasiliev published today in Sport Express, dismisses these rumours and says that he’s unaware of any protests from Carlsen. He also confirms the matches will take place in Kazan and explains that it was too late to look at other options (he doubted that Sofia could actually have guaranteed funding in time). He says that the Russian Chess Federation will be providing the prize fund (not Azerbaijan), and that it will be at least 500,000 euro.
The tournament format will not be changed to longer matches as Gelfand was unwilling to accept Sutovsky’s proposed changes during this cycle, so all the matches will be played without a break in Kazan.
On a lighter note, Ilyumzhinov scored 100% in an amateur blitz tournament which included Henrik Carlsen, and he’s not thinking of introducing the vuvuzela to chess tournaments… but they’re looking at the possibility of holding the 2016 World Chess Olympiad in South Africa.
11 responses to ““The Russian player we played a match against in 2006 in Elista doesn’t exist for us!””
“In general, I have to say that during the match everyone was rooting against us, except the Bulgarians.”
And he still does not get the hint !! :-).
If I know that everyone is rooting against me I’d ask myself “why?” and ponder on what I might have done. Of course there is small percent of cases where the whole world has just gone nuts and you are the only one with sensibility; but chances are you had done something bad.
I have to admit, this man in unique. He keeps saying, the Russians did horrible things in Elista. What was the inconvenience caused to them. Topalov reacted first with the cheating accusation. Then they got the forfeit point.
Well anyway, this site is great. Spicy chess news coverage for sure.
interesting read; dainalov seems to be delusional. it makes for compelling drama, though, especially if his protege’ faces the player who’s “called vladimir kramnik”.
the bad guy named danilov, despite all of his shortcomings, has brought more than ten million euro in sponsorhip money to chess. that is very impressive.
its an election year. money talks, bullshit walks.
how much sponsorship money has karpov or von weizaecker or chessbase brought to chess? just curious.
Hey Realty Check
Money is not everthing as Kirsan has also brought in millions of dollars for chess.
Both Kirsan (with his dubious sources) and Danailov (with his shenanigans) are a shame to chess.
Sponsors want a “controversy free” sport and it will not be much time before Danailov’s sponsors desert him. Just wait and watch!
Danailov: “I’m the only candidate who has his own personal website.”
He simply “forgot” to mention the much better website of the Turkish candidate Ali Nihat Yazici, http://www.wereurope.org.
Thanks! I’ve added that to the article.
More for the sake of completeness …. : Robert von Weizsäcker also has a campaign website, http://a-brighter-future-for-chess.de/
Thanks once more – I looked for that, but couldn’t find it. It’s not overflowing with content, but I’ll add it as well.
I’ve been following chess for over 25 years and I simply don’t believe chess is ever destined to have good organization. The great players just want to play and no one knows how to create viable sponsorship. Some organizers are gifted, well intended amateur enthusiasts and some are just ego-tripping nitwits scrapping for small change. It’s a game for kings and paupers…
Danailov certainly provides entertainment in the chess world. He is a clown in chess. What he says should be ignored but I have to say it is fun to read his interview. In chess when nothing is going on, it is fun to read his interview. I hope he realizes that he is not going to EU chess election as when he speaks he is telling the world why they should not vote for him. Topalov should desert him. Danailov gives bad name to bulgaria and Topalov. Somehow I dont like both of them personally.